Yggdrasil
MCP ServersMCP 伺服器 SKILLs技能 PlugIns解決方案 Asgard AI SolutionAsgard AI 方案 Submit Listing申請上架 GitHub
C

Compensation Benchmarking 薪酬標竿分析

Released已發布
algorithm algorithm

Conduct compensation benchmarking analysis to position salaries against market data. Use this skill when the user needs to assess pay competitiveness, build salary bands, or analyze pay equity — even if they say 'are we paying market rate', 'salary benchmarking', or 'compensation analysis'.

演算法技能:Compensation Benchmarking 分析與應用。

View on GitHub在 GitHub 查看

Overview概述

Compensation benchmarking compares internal pay levels against external market data to assess competitiveness. Uses compa-ratio (actual pay / market midpoint) and percentile positioning. Informs salary band design, pay adjustments, and equity analysis.

When to Use使用時機

Trigger conditions:

  • Evaluating whether current salaries are competitive with the market
  • Designing or updating salary bands and pay structures
  • Identifying pay equity gaps across demographics or roles

When NOT to use:

  • For individual performance-based pay decisions (use performance management)
  • When no market data is available (need at least survey benchmarks)

Algorithm 演算法

IRON LAW: Benchmarking Is Only Valid With COMPARABLE Jobs
Matching by job TITLE alone is unreliable — "Senior Engineer" means
vastly different things at different companies. Match by: job content
(duties, scope), level (IC vs manager, experience band), industry,
geography, and company size. Poor job matching produces misleading
market rates.

Phase 1: Input Validation

Collect: internal compensation data (base, bonus, equity), market survey data (P25, P50, P75 by role), job matching between internal roles and survey benchmarks. Gate: Jobs properly matched, survey data current (< 18 months).

Phase 2: Core Algorithm

  1. Match internal jobs to market benchmarks by content, level, and scope
  2. Age survey data to current date: apply projected market movement rate
  3. Compute compa-ratio per employee: actual base / market P50
  4. Compute percentile positioning: where does actual pay fall in market distribution
  5. Analyze: by department, level, tenure, demographics for equity gaps

Phase 3: Verification

Check: compa-ratios cluster around 0.85-1.15 (normal range). Flag outliers (< 0.80 underpaid, > 1.20 overpaid). Test demographic equity. Gate: Distribution reasonable, equity analysis completed.

Phase 4: Output

Return benchmarking results with band recommendations.

Output Format輸出格式

{
  "summary": {"avg_compa_ratio": 0.97, "below_band_pct": 12, "above_band_pct": 8},
  "by_role": [{"role": "Software Engineer", "market_p50": 1800000, "avg_actual": 1750000, "compa_ratio": 0.97}],
  "equity_flags": [{"dimension": "gender", "gap_pct": 3.2, "statistically_significant": true}],
  "metadata": {"employees": 500, "survey_source": "Mercer", "survey_date": "2025-H2"}
}

Examples範例

Sample I/O

Input: 50 engineers, market P50=NT$1.8M, actual range NT$1.5M-2.1M Expected: Avg compa-ratio ~0.97, some below-band employees flagged for adjustment.

Edge Cases

Input Expected Why
Hot market (tech boom) Market data rapidly outdated Apply higher aging factor
Remote work mixed Location-adjusted bands needed SF vs Taipei market rates differ 2-3x
Small company, no survey match Use broader industry proxies Imperfect but better than nothing

Gotchas注意事項

  • Total compensation: Base salary benchmarking alone misses equity, bonuses, and benefits. Compare total comp for accurate positioning.
  • Survey data lag: Published surveys reflect data collected 6-18 months ago. In fast-moving markets, age the data forward.
  • Internal equity vs external competitiveness: Aligning with market may create internal inequities (new hire paid more than tenured employee). Balance both.
  • Geographic differentials: Remote work complicates location-based pay. Define a clear policy: pay by HQ location, employee location, or hybrid.
  • Pay equity legal risk: Unexplained demographic pay gaps expose legal liability. Conduct regression-based equity analysis controlling for legitimate factors (experience, performance, level).

References參考資料

  • For salary band design methodology, see references/band-design.md
  • For pay equity regression analysis, see references/pay-equity.md

Tags標籤

hrcompensationbenchmarkingsalary-analysis